Which right was reinforced in Escobedo v Illinois (1964)?

Gear up for the TCOLE Important Case Law Test. Study with interactive flashcards and multiple choice questions, with detailed hints and explanations to acing your exam!

In Escobedo v. Illinois (1964), the right that was reinforced is the right to an attorney prior to questioning. This landmark Supreme Court case established that a suspect has the constitutional right to counsel during police interrogations once the investigation shifts from a general inquiry into a particular suspect. The decision emphasized that without access to legal representation, an individual's ability to defend themselves against self-incrimination is severely compromised. This case set a precedent that affirmed the necessity of providing an attorney to a suspect as part of the Sixth Amendment rights, ensuring that individuals can receive adequate legal support during critical stages of addressing criminal charges. The ruling underscored the importance of legal counsel in protecting individuals' rights during the investigative process.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy