Which case involved the issue of due process rights of a suspect during interrogations?

The case that involved the issue of due process rights of a suspect during interrogations is Bram v. U.S. This landmark decision established critical principles regarding the admissibility of confessions obtained during police interrogations. The Supreme Court held that confessions must be voluntary and that the due process clause protects individuals from self-incrimination through coercive interrogation techniques.

In this case, the Court examined whether the confession obtained from the suspect was voluntary or coerced. It determined that any confession that is not made freely and without compulsion violates the due process rights guaranteed by the 14th Amendment. As a result, Bram's confession was deemed inadmissible as it was obtained in violation of his rights, underscoring the important requirement for law enforcement to conduct interrogations in a manner that respects an individual's constitutional protections.

While other cases listed may involve various aspects of law enforcement and individual rights, they do not directly address the specific issue of due process rights during interrogations in the same manner or context as Bram v. U.S.