What common factor do both New York v. Belton and Reynolds v. State address?

Both New York v. Belton and Reynolds v. State delve into the scope of search and seizure laws, specifically examining the parameters of what law enforcement can legally search during or following an arrest. In New York v. Belton, the U.S. Supreme Court addressed the issue of whether officers could search the passenger compartment of a vehicle following the arrest of an occupant. The ruling established that a vehicle's passenger compartment is within the immediate control of an arrestee, which justifies such searches without a warrant when evaluating officer safety and the preservation of evidence.

Similarly, Reynolds v. State focuses on the application of search and seizure rules in a legal context, examining officers' actions in relation to the evidence they seek during an arrest. This case underscores the importance of understanding how the Fourth Amendment limits searches and the specific circumstances under which evidence may be deemed admissible in court.

Together, these cases highlight the legal standards governing searches incident to arrests, influencing law enforcement practices regarding the seizure of evidence without a warrant. Understanding this common factor is essential for properly navigating the complex landscape of search and seizure laws.