In U.S. v Good (1986), what was a key holding regarding constitutional rights?

In U.S. v. Good (1986), the key holding focused on the protection against unreasonable searches. The case emphasized the importance of the Fourth Amendment in safeguarding individuals from arbitrary government intrusions. The ruling clarified that law enforcement must have probable cause and, in many cases, a warrant to conduct searches and seizures, reinforcing the constitutional principle that individuals have a right to privacy in their persons, homes, and belongings. This case contributed to the broader interpretation and enforcement of constitutional protections against unreasonable searches, illustrating the continual evolution of search and seizure law.

Other concepts such as a fair trial, extended rights of accused persons, and the admissibility of confession evidence, while significant in other contexts, were not the primary focus of the ruling in U.S. v. Good. This case is key for understanding the specific protections provided under the Fourth Amendment, which directly relates to the discussion of unreasonable searches and the constitutional rights of individuals in those situations.