In Michigan v Long, what limitation was established regarding vehicle searches?

In Michigan v. Long, the Supreme Court established a significant precedent regarding searches of vehicles, specifically addressing the limits of search without a warrant. The ruling upholds that law enforcement officers may conduct a limited search of the passenger compartment of a vehicle if they have reasonable belief that the suspect may be armed and dangerous. This exception is grounded in the need to protect police officers from potential harm during interactions with suspects.

This case recognized the officer's need for safety in situations where they are uncertain about the presence of weapons. The ruling permits a search of areas within the passenger compartment, including under the seats, where a weapon might be concealed, reflecting a balance between an individual’s privacy rights and law enforcement’s interest in ensuring safety.

The other options present limitations that are either too broad or misinterpret the scope of the ruling. The decision does not allow for unrestricted searches throughout the entirety of the vehicle, such as the trunk or other compartments, without probable cause or other justifiable circumstances. Additionally, it does not rule out searching under the seats; rather, it supports such searches when they are conducted within the defined parameters aimed at officer safety.